¿Se dice échale sal a las lentejas o échales sal a las lentejas?
Estimada Chelo:
Lo correcto es Échales sal a las lentejas, ya que les debe concordar en número con el sustantivo al que se refiere: lentejas (plural).
Un saludo,
Castellano Actual
We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.
To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.
This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.
Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.
If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email
Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:
Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all of the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.
These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.
Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside of it.
Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.
We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers), both for Windows and for MAC users.
Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs, there may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to
Interesante consulta, solo que la respuesta me deja duda.
¿Se dice échale sal a las lentejas o échales sal a las lentejas?
Y nos dicen que “Lo correcto es: Échales sal a las lentejas,”
Sí y no. ¿Qué tal si fuera: Échale (tú) sal a las lentejas.?
Estimado Jacinto:
Seguiría siendo échales porque el pronombre remplaza el complemento indirecto (a las lentejas) que está en plural.
Saludos cordiales,
Castellano Actual
En esa frase lo correcto es Échale, en singular, pues estás echando, tú, la sal.
Échale la sal, ¿A qué?, Puede ser a las lentejas o a la olla, o a la sartén, o al agua.
Es un imperativo TÚ ECHALE.
Dudar en estas situaciones es comprensible, y la respuesta tampoco ayuda…
Creo que tenemos un sujeto (tú), un verbo (echa), un complemento directo (sal), y un complemento indirecto (a las lentejas). En el caso de “échales sal a las lentejas”, tanto el “les” como lentejas son el complemento indirecto, por lo que deben estar en concordancia.
Si en vez de lentejas fuera una sopa, yo diría “échale sal a la sopa”.
Y si en vez de sal fueran sales, diría “échale sales a la sopa”.
Jmjh, lee con detenimiento el comentario de Santiago R Menacho. En su comentario está la clave. El imperativo que mencionas sólo llega hasta ECHA. El “le”, o “les” (singular y plural), si no mal recuerdo, se llaman pronombres enclíticos pues se pueden unir al verbo (échale, échales). Si haces un análisis pragmático, podrías entenderlo mejor:
A: Ya puse las lentejas a cocer.
B: Échales sal.
A: Ya lo hice, ya les puse sal.
“Les” sustituyen a “lentejas” (objeto indirecto), o sea, son pronombres. Uno de ellos es una palabra compuesta (enclítico) “echa” (imperativo) + “les” (pronombre) que da “échales”. Por eso, los pronombres deben concordar en número con el sujeto que sustituyen (lentejas = les).
Será muy académico decir como explican, pero si se considera “las lentejas” como una entidad (algo que es común en el diario hablar), a la olla de lentejas, al plato de lentejas, creo que seguiremos diciendo “Échale sal a las lentejas”.
Cierto, Anónimo, seguiremos diciendo “Échale sal a las lentejas”, o “Échales sal”, o “Échale sal a tu plato de lentejas”, o “Échale sal a la olla de lentejas”. Como verás, dependerá de la pertinencia del enunciado en el contexto (situación real) y de la intención del hablante. Parece que en eso consiste la diferencia entre lingüística teórica (que, según entiendo, tiene la intención de explicar el lenguaje como totalidad) y lingüística aplicada (que, creo, tiene una finalidad práctica para resolver problemas surgidos de la comunicación). ¿Cuál de las dos vertientes lingüísticas te serviría para tus enunciados?